We cant let Opening Day go by without sharing our future picks for the 2011 season. After going 4-0 in 2009, we stumbled to 2-2 a year ago. Thanks again, you choking dog Colorado Rockies whose 1-9 final ten games left us a single win shy of winning their over bet. But we’re not here to talk about past, let’s move forward, hope springs eternal and here’s who we are cheering for this year.
Phillies Under 96.5 wins….I guess this means we’re cheering for the rest of the National League. Nobody has more respect for the Fighting Phils than I. And, let’s not forget them taking the division crown a year ago was one of our future winners. But, man 97 wins is a lot. It’s a mark thats not hit that often by anyone, and one the Phils have only hit once during their four-year reign atop the NL East. They come into the season with a lot of health issues. They could have dominant starting pitching. But with Baseball Prospectus calling for just 89 wins, I’m taking a flier that the Vegas win total is inflated by public opinion thanks to said pitching staff. Look for the Phils to win another division but fall a handul of wins shy of the 97 mark.
Tampa Bay Over 84……Yes, I know they lost some stars. But there are plenty left over. Would anyone be surprised if Evan Longoria competed for the MVP while David Price makes a run at a Cy Young? I wouldnt, and the Rays will be threatening another 90-win season in the process. Regardless, there is more than enough for this team to still finish in third place in the strong AL East and be, performance wise, a top-5 team in the AL. I think this number might be a few results too low because the public thinks the cute Rays will fade because a couple of their key guys bolted. I dont know about that. I think we’ll be talking about the Rays the way we talk about the Twins, wondering how they keep putting up good seasons despite losing guys all the time. Besides, I am currently reading The Extra Two Percent, the story on how the Rays built themselves into a contender. If thats not a sign to play on the Rays, then I dont know what is. I expect the Rays to be a strong contender for the Wild Card out of the AL and usually those teams score in the high-80s as far as wins go. This play could really use a bounceback year from James Shields, so we’re thinking good things about him in the lead up to his first start of the year.
San Diego Padres Over 75.5 wins……The Padres out paced everybody’s expectations a year ago with a 90-win season and nearly winning the NL West Pennant. They said goodbye to their best hitter Adrian Gonzalez in the off season, but is his absences really going to cost 15 wins and make the Padres a 75-win team? I dont think so. The Fathers have the best bullpen and defense in the NL and they still have a starting rotation you can win games and stay in contention with. I think they’re a good bet to have another winning record, let alone get to the 76 wins needed to win this over. As a Michigan fan, I have to place a bet on a team with former Wolverine Clayton Richards in their rotation, right? Exactly. Go Padres!
Ichiro Over 197.5 hits…..He’s never hit less than 200 before in his major league career. He doesnt appear hurt or appear to be slowing down as a hit machine. Maybe this is too good to be true, I dont know. He might not have the best fantasy value as he once did because nobody on the M’s knows how to drive him home for runs, but I dont think he needs any of those guys to put a 200-hit season together in his sleep. He legged out a career high 53 infield hits a year ago, so there is a concern that he’ll fall off there. But, even a one-third dropoff on production on that front would still get us the over as long as Ichiro keeps on smacking out base hits into the outfield the way he’s been ever since he arrived on the scene.
Adam Dunn Over 35.5 home runs…..He hasnt hit less than 38 in the last seven seasons. And now that he’s playing on a good team, in the AL, and in a quality hitter’s park in Sox Park on the south side, I have a sneaky suspicion we’re going to see a 40-plus home runs season out of him. Read more »


