Monthly Archives: April 2010

NHL Playoffs: Where Underdogs Profit

April 19, 2010
By

The NHL playoffs are where underdogs profit. So far at least. Through the first five days of the Stanley Cup Tournament, the underdog is 10-9. But that just above break even mark carries a lot more profit than the record suggests. Had you been wagering a unit on all the dogs so far, you’d be up 9.15 units. Thats some major money in less than a week’s time. Wins by Montreal, Nashville, Colorado and Ottawa in the opening games of their series each basically netted 2/1 or better payouts, accounting for most of the profits.

The NHL playoffs are always known to be topsy-turvy. No first round result is really surprising. Top seeds cant take advancing for granted. It seems every year at least one of top four top 2-seed conference seeds goes down in the first round. To that end, I thought maybe an easy profit could be made by putting a unit on each seventh and eigth seed. As it turns out, it wasnt mathematically possible as the 2/7 series in the East between the Devils and Flyers only paid a shade less than 2/1 for underdog Philadelphia. So I lost track of the idea. Betting the other three, however, would net a profit of at at least 41 percent with just one series win. Since all three dogs stole home ice advantage in the first two games, we’d be giving it an exciting run. Regardless, there is going to be some anxious and killer swing games in Montreal, Denver and Nashville this weekend as five games in the next four nights will be spend on the road, their seasons in the balance, after spending the long, marathon schedule branding themsevles as Cup contenders. I should have also just gone ahead and pulled the trigger on the flyers for the series. A 2-2 record would have been needed to pull a profit, but the Flyers owning a 2-1 lead, we’re ahead of the game with home ice in every series as we head in the middle of the first series of games.

But I never once thought to just play aggressive and blins every dog in every game on the board. If you squint, off in the distance, you can see the clouds of dust kicked up by the money making bandwagon that passed us by without stopping. Sigh. I felt like I should have been all over a reckless sounding strategy that involves every single game. Well, not every game. The Phily win over the Devils last night in OT doesnt factor in since the closing line against each was -104 last night. It was a tried and true pick ‘em that the Flyers won, yo. But the question is can we will draft of this train and pull in some bucks. Of the three games tonight, two give us underdogs. With -102 and -106 odds on LA and Vancouver respectively we push that one aside. The others would five us Montreal at +156 and Buffalo at +125. All we need is one win to profit. Usually you need 54 percent to profit. Here we need 50 percent. With two games. you would need 100 percent in most cases to make money. Here we need 50 percent. This isnt exactly how wiseguys define value, but it is how you shift some of the odds into your favor. After our 2-0 debut foray in the 2010 playoffs with last night’s twitter posts, we’re game to join the party, even if the top shelf goods are already won.

Book Montreal and Buffalo tonight.

Take Me Out To The Ballgame: Bookin’ Baseball Future Bets

April 5, 2010
By

Last year, I broke new ground and placed my first ever future bets of any kind for a single season when I took some win totals for the 2009 baseball campaign. When I was tinkering with what amounted to the JustCoverBlog 0.5, I wrote a blog post about it. I would blog randomly throughout the summer on the ups and downs of the endeavor. That was part of the plan for the fledgling blog. Well, that aspect didnt carry over when the JCB debuted in wordpress in the summer. But, the picks did endure. Fortune shined on me all season, and I won all four. I dont really gamble on baseball. It’s not that fun. But after last year’s success, I feel the pull to put something down on some baseball futures to at least give me an active stake in the season. I dont really consider myself a fan of any baseball team, so this will also give me something to follow and root for until the 2010 football season becomes a reality. At times, we’ll be dressed up as blogs for these teams as we chronicle the progress of these investments. We know we’ll have fun tracking these. We hope we’re as lucky as last year. Let’s Play Ball!

COLORADO OVER 85 WINS

I keep hearing about how great Colorado is going to be. Some have said they have the deepest team in the National League. Its hype that I buy. They are young, talented and can beat you in many different ways. With playoff appearances in two out of the last three years, they know how to win. I think its a 90-win ballclub, and they wont need a major break through to get that done. Everybody seems to be picking them, both pundits and the gamblers. They are the chic pick this spring, but they still are not betting chalk to win the division. You can still get 2.25 to 1 on them at sportsbook, while the Dodgers remain the favorite per their board at 1.5 to 1. 

 I happen to agree with the Rockies love. And I’m excited to see them play. But, I feel they have a better shot at achieving at least 85 wins than they do winning the NL West. I feel this division could easily have a pair of 90-game winners. The Rockies, Dodgers and Giants would all be in my top-half of the NL if I were the sort to concoct power ratings. I’d put Arizona up there as well if you can guarantee me a healthy Brandon Webb who will bounce back as strongly as, for example, Chris Carpenter did a year ago. I do think the Rockies are the best of the NL West bunch, but so many things can happen to keep this team from winning this division. Unlike them getting beyond the 85-win mark, winning the division would be a franchise break through. I dont know if I want to bet with certainty that that will happen. But, this team wont languish near .500. They have too much talent. They’ll cruise by the 85 win mark before summer ends. But, the NL West race wont be over by then. They wont win any NL West bet I would make if they dont go over 85 wins, anyway. This Over 84.5 is the easier bet to win, so I’ll take it.

Besides, I want a reason to watch and root for the Rockies. I always had a fantasy baseball rule of always making sure to pick a Rockie and get in early on whoever is suddenly going to be getting a lot of at-bats in their lineup. I did so because its fun to have an invested reason in staying up late on any given night in the summer to pull for something good to happen with the always potent Rockie offense. I loved the thrill of seeing a 10-7 final score, knowing that a guy on my fantasy team probably had fingerprints all over one of those rallies. Over the years, I have had some fun runs with Todd Helton, Garret Atkinson, Brad Hawpe and Matt Holliday. In recent seasons, I have also seeked out their pitchers. Ubaldo Jimeniz anchored my club last year that adanced into my league’s Final Four. Well, I am officially retired from fantasy baseball. Or at least taking a one year break. I know I will miss the thrill of tuning into a Rockies game for those implications. So, I am doing the next best thing. I’m investing in their season. Given this is the best the franchise has ever looked, its the right timing. I think they pass this win mark before the first Sunday of the NFL season. I cant wait for 2010 Rockie baseball. I wont even let the fact that four Colorado pitchers begin the season on the DL  get me down today. But, I will point out its reasons like that that I feel this win investment is a safer one, even if it doesnt pay out as much, as any of them taking the NL West pennant. Read more »

Bracket News: Final Four Saturday

April 3, 2010
By

We’ve finally reached Final Four Saturday.  I happen to think its a great doubleheader of hoops.

We get two March Maestros in Izzo and Coach K. Love them or hate them, any unbiased basketball fan has to enjoy watching these coaches pull all the right strings in guiding their teams on Final Four runs. They’ve only met once in the NCAA Tournament, 11 years ago in the 1999 Final Four. That was Izzo’s first and a year before he broke through a won a national title. We’re a win by each away from having a titanic coaching matchup in the championship game. In a sport thats still driven in large part by the man on the sidelines, that’s juicy. Personally, I want both or none. If Sparty wins the opener, the basketball fan in me will be pulling a bit more for Duke so we get the Izzo/Krzyzewski chess match. I dont want one without the other, so a Butler win might squash whatever fandom I could muster up for Duke. Although Butler beating both Izzo and Krzyzewski en route to a championship would validate this awesome Bulldog run even more. I could handle the tournament ending with a Butler win over Duke. The adopted Hoosier in me might go as far as even relishing it a bit.

There are more than enough sentimental reasons to pull for West Virginia as well. It would be an historic national title for them as well.  A Butler/WVA final would be a battle between programs looking for their first ever national championship. I like those matches better than when one is going for their first against a power with a full trophy case. There’s less lazy stories about the intangible edge of experience. But, I am pulling for WVA because I have enjoyed the Bob Huggins Renaissance. And I really like a lot of players on this team. They’re fun to watch. I think you can make a case this is the most talented team remaining in the field, guru approved recruiting classes in East Lansing and Durham be damned.

But getting back to Huggy Bear. I know I would have laughed at you had you told me in 1992 that it would take 18 years for Huggy to reach another Final Four. Back in the spring of 1992, Huggins nearly reached the pinnacle of the sport with his rebuil Bearcat program. When he arried at Cincy, the Bearcats hadnt even made the tournament in well oer a decade. One of their starters was a walk-on from the football team. But behind the dynamic inside/outside duo of Herb Jones and Nick Van Exel, Cincy broke their NCAA drought in Year 3 of Huggins tenure and adanced all the way to the Final Four. They lost in the national semifinals in back and forth nailbiter, 76-72, to the Fab Five Freshmen of Michigan. In retrospect, it remains the most underrated win in the history of Fab Five.

Cincinnati was clearly a program on the rise. Bob Huggins was creating a national power. But not only did he never get back to the Final Four, he only made three Sweet 16s the rest of the time in Cincy. The farthest he got was the very next season, with many of the same players from the year before still chipping in,when  the Bearcats advanced into the Elite 8 before losing to eventual champ North Carolina in overtime. They had another Elite Eight run in 1996 when the Danny Forston-led club fell to Mississipi State in the regional finals.  Otherwise, Huggy’s time was marked by March underachievement. Six times in an eight year stretch, including four times in a row, the Bearcats and Huggy couldnt survive the first weekend of the tournament despite being given a top-4 seed in the region. Of course, the other trend with Cincy involved their ugly style of play on the court and brutish behavior off it. His players started getting in trouble, questions arose over the graduation rates and when he himself got picked up on DUI charges, the university canned him after the 2005 season, which ended in, what else, a second round NCAA tournament loss.

Some are bothered by that checkered resume. I am not so much. Huggins has helped a whole lot more kids than harm. And he deserves a second chance at coaching. I have enjoyed this West Virginia Renaissance of his. He was a walking profanity at Cincy. Almost as much the show as anything else. He’s mellower on the WVA sideline. Beyond that, its just how his teams have played in the three seasons he’s been there. Those Bearcat teams were brutes and they played a collegiate style of Bad Boy/Detroit Piston style. But, once Van Exel left they never had any dynamic scorers that had you on the edge of your seat. Just defensive beatdowns. It was boring, ugly hoops. This Mountaineer team is beginning to show off a mean defensive edge like those squads, but with so much more offensive elegance and effeicieny that I sometimes have to remind myself I’m watching a Huggins coached team. So, I’ve been fascinated with this team all year. Its only fitting they’re still around the final weekend. And I’m happy for Huggins. He was too good a coach to be remembered as a March underachiever. Read more »